UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SCHEDULE 13D/A
INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN STATEMENTS FILED PURSUANT
TO RULES 13d-1(a) AND AMENDMENTS THERETO FILED
PURSUANT TO RULE 13d-2(a)
(Amendment No.2)*
Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share
(Title of Class of Securities)
08160H101
(CUSIP Number)
- Page 1 of 10 -
Jerome J. Lande
MMI Investments, L.P.
152 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019
(212) 586-4333
(Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized
to Receive Notices and Communications)
March 30, 2005
(Date of Event which Requires Filing of this Statement)
If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of Sections 240.13d-1(e), 240.13d-1(f) or 240.13d-1(g), check the following box. ¨
Note: Schedules filed in paper format shall include a signed original and five copies of the schedule, including all exhibits. See Section 240.13d-7 for other parties to whom copies are to be sent.
* The remainder of this cover page shall be filled out for a reporting persons initial filing on this form with respect to the subject class of securities, and for any subsequent amendment containing information which would alter disclosures provided in a prior cover page.
The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Act) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act (however, see the Notes).
Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.
- Page 2 of 10 -
Page 3 of 10 | ||||||
1. | Names of Reporting Persons MMI Investments, L.P. |
I.R.S. Identification Nos. of above persons
(entities only): 141810589 |
||||
2. | Check the Appropriate Box if a Member of a Group | |||||
(a) | o | |||||
(b) | o | |||||
3. | SEC Use Only | |||||
4. | Source of Funds (See Instructions) OO |
|||||
5. | Check Box if Disclosure of Legal Proceedings Is Required Pursuant to Item 2(d) or 2(e) o | |||||
6. | Citizenship or Place of Organization Delaware |
|||||
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person With | ||||||
7. | Sole Voting Power 2,740,100 | |||||
8. | Shared Voting Power | |||||
9. | Sole Dispositive Power 2,740,100 | |||||
10. | Shared Dispositive Power | |||||
11. | Aggregate Amount Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person 2,740,100 |
|||||
12. | Check if the Aggregate Amount in Row (11) Excludes Certain Shares o |
|||||
13. | Percent of Class Represented by Amount in Row (11) 6.6% | |||||
14. | Type of Reporting Person PN | |||||
-Page 3 of 10-
Page 4 of 10 | ||||||
1. | Names of Reporting Persons MCM Management, LLC |
I.R.S. Identification Nos. of above persons
(entities only): 141814578 |
||||
2. | Check the Appropriate Box if a Member of a Group | |||||
(a) | o | |||||
(b) | o | |||||
3. | SEC Use Only | |||||
4. | Source of Funds (See Instructions) AF |
|||||
5. | Check Box if Disclosure of Legal Proceedings Is Required Pursuant to Item 2(d) or 2(e) o | |||||
6. | Citizenship or Place of
Organization Delaware |
|||||
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person With | ||||||
7. | Sole Voting Power 2,740,100 | |||||
8. | Shared Voting Power | |||||
9. | Sole Dispositive Power 2,740,100 | |||||
10. | Shared Dispositive Power | |||||
11. | Aggregate Amount Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person 2,740,100 |
|||||
12. | Check if the Aggregate Amount in Row (11) Excludes Certain Shares o |
|||||
13. | Percent of Class Represented by Amount in Row (11) 6.6% | |||||
14. | Type of Reporting Person OO | |||||
-Page 4 of 10-
ITEM 1. SECURITY AND ISSUER
This Amendment No. 2 to statement on Schedule 13D (this Statement) relates to the Common Stock, par value $.10 per share (the Common Stock), of Benchmark Electronics, Inc., a Texas corporation (the Issuer or the Company), the principal executive offices of which are located at 3000 Technology Drive, Angleton, Texas 77515. This Amendment No. 2 amends and restates in full each of the items set forth below. Terms not defined in this Amendment No. 2 shall have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Schedule 13D as originally deemed filed on September 20, 2004 (Original Schedule 13D).
ITEM 3. SOURCE AND AMOUNT OF FUNDS OR OTHER CONSIDERATION
The total purchase price of the 2,740,100 shares of Common Stock (the Shares) purchased by MMI Investments was $77,087,452, all of which has been financed by incurring margin loans. These margin loans were obtained from Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. under customary terms and conditions. The entire principal amount of such margin loans remains outstanding as of the date of this Statement.
ITEM 4. PURPOSE OF TRANSACTION
MMI Investments purchased the Shares as part of its investment activities. The Reporting Persons intend to review and evaluate the investment by MMI Investments in the Common Stock of the Issuer on an ongoing basis and may, depending upon their evaluation of the business and prospects of the Issuer, or such other considerations as they may deem relevant, determine to increase, decrease or dispose of MMI Investments holdings of Common Stock. As part of such review and evaluation, the Reporting Persons may communicate with the Issuers management, directors and other shareholders, including as described in the following paragraph.
On March 30, 2005, MMI Investments submitted to the Board of Benchmark a cover letter and presentation, filed herewith as Exhibit 2, analyzing the Companys cash and liquidity position and discussing MMI Investments views concerning the desirability of payment of a special cash dividend.
Other than as described in this Item 4, neither Reporting Person, nor, to the knowledge of each Reporting Person, any individuals listed on Schedule I, has any current plan or proposal that relates to or would result in any of the transactions or other matters specified in clauses (a) through (j) of Item 4 of Schedule 13D; provided that the Reporting Persons reserve the right to develop such plans or proposals.
ITEM 5. INTEREST IN SECURITIES OF THE ISSUER
(a)-(b) Based on 41,654,694 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 9, 2005, as reported in the Issuers Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2005, the Shares owned by MMI Investments represent approximately 6.6% of the outstanding Common Stock. MMI Investments has the sole power to direct the vote and disposition of such Shares on the date of this Statement. However, by virtue of being the general partner of MMI Investments, MCM may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the Shares owned by MMI Investments and to have sole power over the voting and disposition of such Shares as a result of its having the sole power to make voting and disposition decisions on behalf of MMI Investments with respect to such Shares.
Except for the Shares owned by MMI Investments, as of the date hereof, neither MCM nor, to MMI Investments and MCMs knowledge, any of the persons listed on Schedule I, owns any Common Stock of the Issuer or has any right to acquire, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of other Common Stock of the Issuer.
(c) Except for the open market purchase of Common Stock by MMI Investments set forth in Schedule II attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, there have been no transactions with respect to the Common Stock during the past 60 days by MMI Investments, MCM, or, to either Reporting Persons knowledge, any of the persons listed on Schedule I.
(d) No person other than MMI Investments is known to either Reporting Person to have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from or the proceeds from the sale of, any of the Shares referred to in Item 5(a) above.
(e) Not applicable.
- Page 5 of 10 -
ITEM 7. MATERIAL TO BE FILED AS EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index appearing elsewhere herein, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- Page 6 of 10 -
SIGNATURE
After reasonable inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the undersigned certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete, and correct.
Pursuant to Rule 13d-1(k)(1)(iii) of Regulation 13D-G of the General Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the undersigned agree that the attached statement is filed on behalf of each of them.
Date: March 31, 2005
MMI INVESTMENTS, L.P. | ||||
By: | MCM Management, LLC | |||
General Partner | ||||
By: | /s/ JEROME J. LANDE | |||
Jerome J. Lande | ||||
Vice President | ||||
MCM MANAGEMENT, LLC | ||||
By: | /s/ JEROME J. LANDE | |||
Jerome J. Lande | ||||
Vice President |
- Page 7 of 10 -
SCHEDULE I
Name and Business Address
|
Position and Principal Occupation | |
John S. Dyson
|
Voting Member and Chairman of MCM; | |
152 West 57th Street
|
Voting Member and Chairman of Millcap Advisors, LLC | |
New York, New York 10019
|
(Millcap), a Delaware
limited liability company 152 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019 |
|
Clay B. Lifflander
|
Voting Member and President of MCM; | |
152 West 57th Street
|
Voting Member and President of Millcap | |
New York, New York 10019 |
- Page 8 of 10 -
SCHEDULE II
OPEN MARKET PURCHASE BY MMI INVESTMENTS
DURING THE PAST 60 DAYS
Trade Date | Number of Shares | Price/Share | ||||||
3/17/05 |
30,000 | $ | 30.84 |
- Page 9 of 10 -
EXHIBIT INDEX
Number | Description | |
1.
|
Joint Filing Agreement dated as of September 20, 2004, by and between MMI Investments and MCM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Original Schedule 13D) | |
2.
|
MMI Investments, L. P. Cover Letter and Presentation to the Board of Directors of Benchmark Electronics, Inc. Optimizing Shareholder Value |
- Page 10 of 10 -
March 30, 2005 | Exhibit 2 |
Mr. Cary T. Fu
Chief Executive Officer and President
Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
3000 Technology Drive
Angleton, TX 77515
Dear Cary:
We have spent a considerable amount of time analyzing our investment in Benchmark. As a major long term shareholder we find it frustrating that you and your management team have done such an excellent job operationally without a corresponding level of benefit in the stock market valuation of the company. The attached presentation for your boards consideration presents our analysis and findings. Major highlights are:
1) | Taking into account customer requirements for a strong balance sheet as well as Benchmarks need to fund expansion in China, Benchmark still has significant excess liquidity; | |||
2) | Benchmark is significantly undervalued, by up to 60%+ depending on the valuation framework on which one focuses; | |||
3) | Special dividends are more attractive than buyback programs, particularly for a small cap issuer like Benchmark; | |||
4) | In todays market it is no longer a negative for technology oriented companies to repatriate cash (e.g. Microsoft, Qualcomm, etc.); and | |||
5) | Although Benchmarks financeability and optimal capital structure could support a dividend as high as $15 per share, we are recommending a special dividend of $8 per share. |
We would welcome the opportunity to discuss your questions and reactions. If you would like us to present this to your board then please let us know. We believe that this simple corporate action could lead to a near term appreciation of 15% to 20% and provide ongoing benefits to Benchmarks customers, employees and shareholders in the form of a stronger stock well into the future.
Regards,
Clay Lifflander
President
Encl.
Cc: | Board of Directors Gayla J. Delly, CFO |
BENCHMARK ELECTRONICS, INC. PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPTIMIZING SHAREHOLDER VALUE BY MMI INVESTMENTS, L.P. MARCH 30th, 2005 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Benchmark Electronics, Inc. Achievements 4 Valuation Shortfall 5 Cash & Liquidity Analysis 6 Liquidity Sources & Uses 7 Repatriation Scenarios 8 Dividends Versus Buybacks 9 Summary 10 Conclusion 11 Notes & Appendices 12 This Presentation is intended only for the use of the Board of Directors of Benchmark Electronics. In our analysis of Benchmark in this Presentation, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information that was available to us from public sources. We have not made any independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Benchmark. This Presentation reflects our best current judgment and reflects assumptions we believe to be reasonable. However, it does not comprehensively state those assumptions, nor does it state the risks and uncertainties to which our analysis are subject. The forward-looking information and analysis included in this Presentation are not necessarily indicative of future actual values and future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable. We believe that our analysis must be considered as a whole. Our views are necessarily based on economic, market, financial and other conditions as they existed, and on the information publicly available to us, as we prepared this Presentation. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MMI Investments, L.P. (MMI) is Benchmark Electronics, Inc.'s (BHE) second largest shareholder MMI seeks long-term appreciation on its BHE investment BHE successful operating initiatives: Sun concentration decline 2000-2004: (39.8%), from 51.2% to 30.8%1 Leading operating margins: 4.6%, more than twice the EMS industry average1 Leading return on invested capital: 19.1%, more than twice EMS industry average1 Strong investor relations effort by accessible management team Despite this, we believe BHE remains undervalued: BHE is undervalued relative to its peers in an already out-of-favor industry BHE's small capitalization precludes it from consideration by many large investors BHE's Sun concentration, though significantly reduced, continues to trouble investors We are concerned that BHE's cash balance may create the perception that BHE either does not prioritize shareholder value or plans to acquire recklessly REPATRIATING SIGNIFICANT CASH WOULD INCREASE SHAREHOLDER VALUE WITHOUT JEOPARDIZING GROWTH OR CUSTOMER CONFIDENCE |
BHE ACHIEVEMENTS Leading ROIC: 19.1% vs. EMS industry mean at 6.4%1 Organic Revenue Growth: 16.2% CAGR vs. (8.7%) for industry since 2001, despite recession & downturn in electronics2 EBIT Margin: 4.6% vs. industry mean of 2.2%1 Decreased Sun Concentration: (39.8%) from 2002-20041 Ex-Sun Growth: 31.9% CAGR from 2002-20041 Net Cash Generation: $604.9mm from 2000-20043 M&A Selectivity: 1 deal, $207.3mm in revenue since 2001, despite the EMS industry consolidation wave and resultant overcapacity1 |
VALUATION SHORTFALL INTRINSIC BASIS Discounted Cash Flow: suggests per share value of $38-$45 4 Precedent Transactions: EBITDA multiples imply $46-$50 5 LBO Valuation: Could be taken private at a 20%+ premium6 Wall Street Research: The average of published price targets is $39, a 27% premium to the current price7 RELATIVE BASIS Peer Earnings: 2%-42% discount to mean P/E & EBITDA multiples8 Historical Forward P/E: 25% discount to BHE 5-yr multiple9 Historical EV/EBITDA: 12% discount to BHE 5-yr multiple9 Market Multiple: 32% discount to forward P/E of the Russell 2000 7 |
CASH & LIQUIDITY ANALYSIS10 BHE'S CASH FLOW HAS BEEN STRONG & STABLE |
LIQUIDITY SOURCES & USES ($ in millions) Cash Balance 12/31/04: $367 Free Cash Flow Estimate 12/04-12/0511: $49 Possible Capacity Expansion Scenarios Acquisition Activity: ($150) Greenfield Chinese Plant Construction: ($50) Capacity Expansion Income/(loss): $5 $0 Net Cash Estimate 12/31/05: $270 - $366 Available Revolver: $229 Net Liquidity Estimate 12/31/05: $499 - $595 |
REPATRIATION SCENARIOS SIGNIFICANT CASH REPATRIATION AND SHAREHOLDER VALUE ACCRETION CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED ALONGSIDE AGGRESSIVE CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT Academic cap structure optimization models prescribe 2.4x Debt/ EBITDA for BHE, or total available cash above $15 per share12 MMI's recommendation is more conservative: Zero Leverage $50mm-$150mm in capacity expansion Remaining net cash of $0-$25mm |
DIVIDEND VERSUS BUY-BACK? Tax-Equivalency: Dividend tax rates have created parity CFO Distraction: buy-backs place ongoing demands on management to time open-market repurchases, a special dividend is a one-time event Execution: "Estimated [buy-back] program completion rates range between 53 and 72 percent of announced levels."14 Transparency: Special dividends are completely transparent and executed on an announced schedule. Buy-backs are typically disclosed after the fact, only quarterly, and have an open-ended timeframe. Float: Buy-backs are not appropriate for small-cap issuers and would reduce BHE's already small float Expectations: "Firms can disgorge temporary cash flows without committing to a permanent increase...The "special" designation tells the shareholders that repetition should not be expected."15 Growth Perception: The following leading technology companies have initiated special or recurring dividends in the last two years - Microsoft, KLA-Tencor, Qualcomm, Intersil, Applied Materials, National Instruments, Cognex and Certegy1 |
SUMMARY BHE has industry leading performance, yet lagging valuation BHE's cash generation has been consistently strong, and increasingly underutilized BHE can fund extraordinary capacity development, retain customer confidence in its liquidity and still create 14.4%-21.5%13 shareholder value accretion with a special dividend of $245.4mm-$365.5mm Common sense and the academic press agree that special dividends provide major advantages over buy-backs to both shareholders and management14,15 WE BELIEVE THAT A SPECIAL DIVIDEND WILL REWARD SHAREHOLDERS, IMPROVING BHE'S ACCESS TO CAPITAL MARKETS AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
CONCLUSION This corporate action will: Retain $50mm-$150mm for expansion in Asia Retain $228-$253mm of net available liquidity Assume no incremental leverage We conclude that this corporate action should: Signal confidence to employees, shareholders & customers Generate shareholder value accretion of 14.4% to 21.5%13 MMI PROPOSES THAT THE BHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECLARE A SPECIAL DIVIDEND OF $8 PER SHARE |
NOTES & APPENDICES |
NOTES Publicly available SEC filings Banc of America research analyst Scott Craig's models Includes $110.3mm from a 2002 stock offering See Appendix, slide 15: Discounted Cash Flow Model See Appendix, slide 17: Precedent Transactions MMI analysis Bloomberg L.P. Publicly available SEC filings and Wall Street estimates FactSet Research Systems, Inc. Publicly available filings, Wall Street and MMI estimates MMI estimate based in part on public information provided by Benchmark |
NOTES NYU Business School Professor Damodaran's Model Optimal Capital Structures Using Cost of Capital Approach. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/. See Appendix page 18 Up to the dividend record date William W. Bratton, The New Dividend Puzzle, Georgetown University Law Center, Business, Economics and Regulatory Policy Working Paper No. 535462 (April, 2004); Murali Jagannathan, Clifford P. Stephens & Michael Weisbach, Financial Flexibility & the Choice Between Dividends and Stock Repurchases, 57 Journal of Financial Economics 355, 357 (2000) Ibid; James A. Brickley, Shareholder Wealth, Information Signaling and The Specially Designated Dividend: An Empirical Study, 12 Journal of Financial Economics 187 (1983) |
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW MODEL |
EMS INDUSTRY PEER GROUP |
PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS |
ACADEMIC CAP STRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION MODEL |